At the Journalism Masterclass IHECS in EghezÃ©e (Belgium) I talked about a social media production flow for the newsroom. It boils down to publishing, as it happens, the “making of” an article, a video, an audio document or an infographic . So journalists do what they usually do: asking for ideas, planning interviews, hunting and gathering stuff on the web, but instead of keeping all that raw material private, they would rather publish it via blog posts. When the article or whatever is “finally” published, it’s not the end, but it can be the beginning of a new round of comments and chat sessions, maybe new and augmented versions. What it means is that the mindset of the journalist shifts toward the open newsroom.
In the meantime, at the Massive Open Online Course #Change11 we’re in week 3 and Martin Weller is facilitating this week’s topic, Digital Scholarship. It’s about â€˜changes in academic practice as a result of new technologyâ€™:
His book The Digital Scholar was published by Bloomsbury, but is available as a free open access book, under a Creative Commons license.
Academics, as journalists, want to have impact. New media often give more impact than scholarly publications alone. Weller then talks about openness:
(…) â€˜digital scholarshipâ€™ is really a shorthand for digital, networked and open. Arguably it is the last component that is most significant. Openness in practice – whether it is sharing ideas via blogs, open courses, open educational resources, open access publishing or open data – is becoming a default approach for many academics (and this course is an example). This has profound implications on practice, business models, identity and the role of sectors, which we are only beginning to appreciate.
Impact and openness, the big themes not only for scientific publications, but also for the media in general. Of course there are tensions:
Tension – there exists a tension currently between the undoubted potential of many digital scholarship approaches and the context which it resides within. So we simultaneously have pockets of marvellous innovation, and at the same time, a markedly conservative, resistant attitude from many institutions, which is often manifest in the how digital scholarship is recognised or encouraged.
Journalists and bloggers can only rejoice about openness by scholars. However, there is a challenge here for traditional media: the journalist with her privileged access to scientists is no longer the inevitable go-between. For instance in economics academics are very active on blogs and even – gasp! – on Twitter. Journalists (and bloggers) of course can provide context and curation.
But while journalists and scientists want more impact and are increasingly in favor of openness, what does this mean for the business models? Opening the newsrooms, labs and universities for free? How will we finance those activities? It’s a question for media and institutions of learning and research alike.
Just a quick FYI. Please don’t be confused with the previously announced Virtual Worlds London is taking place in London 20-21 October 2008. VW London already has drawn support from Linden Lab/Second, Rivers Run Red, The Electric Sheep Company, Multiverse, Qwaq, Parature and more. Virtual Worlds London takes place at The Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre, a beautiful venue right across the street from Westminster Abbey. Speakers are being confirmed as we speak. Virtual Worlds London is produced by Virtual Worlds Management, the company that has been producing internationally acclaimed virtual worlds and MMOG related events since 2003. http://www.VirtualWorldsLondon.com